Abstract
Charitable donors’ decision-making is often informed by the parable of “giving a person a fish versus teaching a person how to fish.” Some donors’ prosocial behaviors are dependency oriented, whereas others are autonomy oriented. Few studies, however, have examined how charitable appeals shape donors’ choices. The authors of the current research investigated this issue in four studies combining various behavioral measures. Results show that positive (versus negative) appeals were more effective in inclining donors toward autonomy-based (versus dependency-based) donations by broadening (versus narrowing) donors’ cognitive scope. This effect was present only when the donors’ motive was to signal their commitment to a cause. These findings, thus, can help enhance the effectiveness of charitable advertisements.
- Received May 4, 2023.
- Received (in revised form) September 17, 2023.
- Accepted September 27, 2023.
- Copyright © 2024 ARF. All rights reserved.
ARF MEMBERS
If you are a member of the Advertising Research Foundation, you can access the content by logging in here
Log In
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 30 days for US$20.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
Log in using your username and password
Vol 64 Issue 3
