Abstract
Vicious discrimination is often experienced by LGBTQIA+ individuals, with the most cited type of discrimination being verbal harassment. This research focuses on the use of negative LGBTQIA-phobic and sexist slurs in social-media marketing advertising. In four experimental studies and two field studies, the authors show that the presence of offensive slurs in social marketing advertisements can provoke shock reactions, leading to higher cognitive elaboration on the target topic. These effects are moderated by social norms and have spillover effects on the intention to change behavior, as well as on the perceived helpfulness of the advertisement. The findings are highly relevant for practitioners seeking to create more poignant prosocial advertisements, but also for researchers who wish to better understand the role of offensiveness in triggering cognitive elaboration.
- Received May 22, 2023.
- Received (in revised form) January 19, 2024.
- Accepted January 22, 2024.
- Copyright © 2024 ARF. All rights reserved.
ARF MEMBERS
If you are a member of the Advertising Research Foundation, you can access the content by logging in here
Log In
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 30 days for US$20.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
Log in using your username and password
Vol 64 Issue 4
Jump to
- Article
- Abstract
- MANAGEMENT SLANT
- INTRODUCTION
- CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT
- PRETEST
- STUDY 1: MAIN EFFECTS AND MEDIATION
- STUDY 2: MODERATION OF SOCIAL NORMS
- STUDY 3: OFFENSIVE WORDS VERSUS NEGATIVE WORDS
- STUDY 4: EXTERNAL VALIDITY TEST ON A DIFFERENT CAUSE
- STUDY 5: FIELD STUDY ON SOCIAL MEDIA
- GENERAL DISCUSSION
- ABOUT THE AUTHORS
- REFERENCES
- Figures & Data
- Supplemental
- Info