Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current issue
    • Archive
    • Digital First
    • JAR Best Paper
    • Open Access
  • Videos
    • JAR Webinars
    • ARF Insights Studio
  • Submit
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Calls For Papers
    • How Can Advertisers Leverage AI and Generative AI?
    • Past Calls
  • Research Priorities
  • About
    • About JAR
    • Impact factor
    • Meet the Editors
    • ARF and Editorial Review
    • ARF members
    • Subscribe to JAR
    • Pay per view
    • JAR in the News
    • My Folders
    • Feedback
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • jadvertres

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us

Search

  • Advanced search
  • Other Publications
    • jadvertres

Log in

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
the Journal of Advertising Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current issue
    • Archive
    • Digital First
    • JAR Best Paper
    • Open Access
  • Videos
    • JAR Webinars
    • ARF Insights Studio
  • Submit
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Calls For Papers
    • How Can Advertisers Leverage AI and Generative AI?
    • Past Calls
  • Research Priorities
  • About
    • About JAR
    • Impact factor
    • Meet the Editors
    • ARF and Editorial Review
    • ARF members
    • Subscribe to JAR
    • Pay per view
    • JAR in the News
    • My Folders
    • Feedback
    • Contact

How Advertising Expenditures Affect Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality

A Psychology-Based Assessment of Brand-, Category-, and Country-Level Moderators

Koushyar Rajavi, Donald R. Lehmann, Kevin Lane Keller, Alireza Golmohammadi
DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2022-026 Published 1 December 2022
Koushyar Rajavi
Georgia Institute of Technology,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: krajavi3@gatech.edu
Donald R. Lehmann
Columbia University,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drl2@columbia.edu
Kevin Lane Keller
Dartmouth College,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kevin.keller@dartmouth.edu
Alireza Golmohammadi
University of North Carolina, Charlotte,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Golmohammadi@uncc.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Conceptual Framework

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Customers’ Perceptions Regarding Different Categories

    CategoryMean scores for:
    INVOLVNPLFREQa
    Apparel and shoes4.685.353.28
    Appliances4.404.904.43
    Beverages: soft drinks3.904.822.55
    Beverages: beer4.375.362.29
    Beverages: spirits3.995.093.00
    Cameras4.725.474.84
    Cars5.125.474.82
    Clothing stores4.655.643.34
    Computer accessories4.995.494.42
    Consumer banks4.924.504.21
    Consumer electronics: audio/visual5.015.404.11
    Consumer packaged goods: coffee and tea4.364.852.76
    Consumer packaged goods: dairies4.614.602.42
    Consumer packaged goods: juices and mixes3.764.742.89
    Consumer packaged goods: ready meals3.795.402.70
    Consumer packaged goods: snacks and sweets4.585.642.60
    Consumer packaged goods: water4.154.252.92
    Consumer packaged goods: other food products4.375.302.58
    Credit cards5.055.114.41
    Department stores4.785.043.40
    Dining: casual dining4.484.872.91
    Dining: fast casual dining4.305.222.82
    Dining: fast food4.035.102.72
    Dining: steakhouses and top casual dining4.554.493.51
    Discount stores4.805.223.08
    Drugs: over-the-counter4.724.983.70
    Drugs: prescription4.865.273.34
    Electronic devices: accessories4.915.134.21
    Financial services4.784.874.09
    Internet service provider and cellular services5.245.064.38
    Investment management4.814.264.02
    Medical devices4.735.013.67
    Payment systems4.564.703.51
    PCs and laptops5.155.504.55
    Restaurants: pizza stores4.295.023.23
    Shops/restaurants: coffee and donut4.254.822.86
    Shops/restaurants: ice cream-smoothie4.345.213.15
    Smart home devices and systems4.565.354.14
    Software and apps4.865.383.63
    Tablets and phones5.165.674.29
    Tools and hardware4.485.003.87
    Travel: airlines4.413.843.98
    Travel: amusement, theme, and water parks4.404.514.22
    Travel: cruises4.594.394.87
    Travel: ground transportation4.174.323.81
    Travel: hotels4.674.583.78
    Travel: other tourist attractions4.414.624.23
    Travel: online travel agencies4.404.584.14
    • Note: NPL = new product launch frequency.

    • ↵a Higher values indicate lower purchase frequency (or more interpurchase time).

  • Table 2

    Variables and Descriptions

    VariableOperationalizationSource/Reference
    Perceived quality (PQ)Percentage of respondents who chose the focal brand in response to the question “Which of the following brands do you think represents good quality?” minus the percentage of respondents who chose the focal brand in response to the question “Which of the following brands do you think represents poor quality?” during each month (a respondent could only choose high-/low-quality brands among those brands for which earlier they had indicated an awareness).YouGov/Du et al. (2019)
    Advertising expenditures (AD)Brand’s total monthly advertising expenditures across different advertising channels (log-transformed).Kantar Media
    Advertising volatility (VOLATIL)Variance in total monthly (log-transformed) advertising expenditures (AD) of a brand over the past six months (before the current time period). Higher values suggest more inconsistency.Kantar Media
    Ownership (OWN)Average of percentage of people who are current customers and percentage of people who, in the past, were customers of services/products offered by the brand.YouGov/Du et al. (2019)
    Brand equity (EQUITY)Whether the brand made it (.5) into the top 200 brands in the United States in the previous year, according to Young & Rubicam’s Brand Asset Valuator, or not (−.5).Young & Rubicam
    Product involvement (INVOLV) (α= .78)Average of three items (“This category is very important to me,” “This category interests me a lot,” and “I would rate shopping in this category as being of the highest importance to me”), with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale.Mturk survey/Dholakia (2001); Steenkamp, Van Heerde, and Geyskens (2010)
    Purchase frequency (FREQ)Interpurchase time in a product category as measured by the following item: “How often do you purchase a product (or a service) in this category?” Responses were: weekly or more often; once a week to once a month; once a month to once every 6 months; once every 6 months to once a year; once a year to once every 5 years; and once every 5 years or more.Mturk survey/Farris and Buzzell (1979)
    Product category age (CATAGE)A binary variable indicating whether the product category is old (−.5) or new (.5). The dichotomy is based on median split of average age of all brands in the category.Google Search, Wikipedia, Factiva
    New product launch frequency (NPL)The extent of new product launch intensity in a category as measured by responses to the following item: “In this category, new products and services are frequently introduced” (5-point Likert scale).Mturk survey/Fischer et al. (2010)
    Macroeconomic condition (gross domestic product per capita; GDPPC)Macroeconomic condition of the country as measured by real quarterly GDPPC.Federal Reserve Economic Data
  • Table 3

    Correlations

    VariablePQADOWNVOLATILEQUITYINVOLVCATAGENPLFREQGDPPC
    PQ—
    AD  .17—
    OWN  .72  .29—
    VOLATIL  .07 −.17  .01—
    EQUITY  .53  .25  .44 −.01—
    INVOLV  .02  .18 −.21 −.09  .06—
    CATAGE  .01 −.10 −.01  .01 −.07  .18—
    NPL  .19  .11  .13  .06  .16  .21  .02—
    FREQ  .01  .14 −.29 −.10  .07  .66  .06 −.17—
    GDPPC  .00  .04 −.04  .02 −.01  .00  .01  .01  .00—
    • Note: PQ = perceived quality; AD = advertising expenditures; OWN = ownership; VOLATIL.= advertising volatility; EQUITY = brand equity; INVOLV = product involvement; CATAGE = product category age; NPL = new product launch frequency; FREQ = purchase frequency; GDPPC = macroeconomic condition (gross domestic product per capita).

  • Table 4

    Effects of Brand-, Category-, and Country-Level Factors on the Relationship between Aggregate Advertising Expenditures and Perceived Quality

    CovariateM1.0: Month FEs and Brand REM1.1: M1.0 + Main Effect VariablesM1.2: M1.1 + InteractionsM1.3: M1.2 + Control Function
    AD.089†.089†.092†.283***
    Interactions
    AD × VOLATIL−.005**−.005**
    AD × OWN.064†.064†
    AD × EQUITY−.113**−.112**
    AD × INVOLV−.106**−.104**
    AD × FREQ.038.037
    AD × CATAGE.035.034
    AD × NPL.085***.084***
    AD × GDPPC1.492**1.486**
    Main Effects/Controls
    VOLATIL−.001−.005−.005
    OWN4.324†4.330†4.245†
    EQUITY−.231−.045−.034
    INVOLV−.734−.751−.963
    FREQ3.385†3.412†3.364†
    CATAGE−.858−.847−.693
    NPL4.708†4.717†4.785†
    GDPPC−1.827−1.884−.347
    Month FEsIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Brand REIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Control FunctionIncluded
    Intercept15.489†15.489†15.440†15.487†
    Number of observations43,08143,08143,08143,081
    Number of brands898898898898
    • Note: FE = fixed effect; RE = random effect; AD = advertising expenditures; VOLATIL = advertising volatility; OWN = ownership; EQUITY = brand equity; INVOLV = product involvement; FREQ = purchase frequency; CATAGE = product category age; NPL = new product launch frequency; GDPPC = macroeconomic condition (gross domestic product per capita).

    • *p < .10;

    • ↵** p < .05;

    • ↵*** p < .01;

    • ↵† p < .001 (significance assessed with brand cluster-adjusted standard errors).

  • Table 5

    The Effect of Advertising Expenditures on Perceived Quality across Different Advertising Channels

    VariableN3.0N3.1N3.2N3.3
    TELEVISION.044.034†.029†.020***
    INTERNET.017**.001.006.003
    PRINT.015***.022***.011*.009
    RADIO.020**.013.021**.017*
    OUTDOOR.031***.028*.028**.027***
    Controls
    Brand FEsIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Year FEsIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Quarter FEsIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Brand × Year FEsIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Brand × Quarter FEsIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Brand × Year × Quarter FEsIncluded
    Five Control functionsIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
    Intercept14.881†14.953†14.967†15.025†
    Number of observations43,08143,08143,08143,081
    Number of brands   898   898   898   898
    • Note: The authors use five control functions to account for the endogeneity of advertising expenditures in each channel. To construct each of the control functions, the authors use an instrumental variable by utilizing average monthly advertising expenditures across all other brands in the category in a particular advertising channel. All five predictors (TELEVISION, INTERNET, PRINT, RADIO, and OUTDOOR) have been log-transformed so that the coefficients for different channels can be comparable (i.e., the coefficients capture change in perceived quality due to a 1-percent increase in advertising expenditures in that channel). FE = fixed effect; RE = random effect.

    • ↵* p < .10;

    • ↵** p < .05;

    • ↵*** p < .01;

    • ↵† p < .001.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Web Appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Web Appendix
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 62 Issue 4

Journal of Advertising Research: 62 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about the Journal of Advertising Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Advertising Expenditures Affect Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from the Journal of Advertising Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of Advertising Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
How Advertising Expenditures Affect Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality
Koushyar Rajavi, Donald R. Lehmann, Kevin Lane Keller, Alireza Golmohammadi
Journal of Advertising Research Dec 2022, 62 (4) 321-335; DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2022-026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Download PDF
Request Permissions
Share
How Advertising Expenditures Affect Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality
Koushyar Rajavi, Donald R. Lehmann, Kevin Lane Keller, Alireza Golmohammadi
Journal of Advertising Research Dec 2022, 62 (4) 321-335; DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2022-026
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Save to my folders

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MANAGEMENT SLANT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND
    • DATA AND MEASURES
    • METHODOLOGY
    • RESULTS
    • VOLATIL
    • OWN
    • EQUITY
    • INVOLV and NPL
    • GDPPC
    • FREQ and CATAGE
    • GENERAL DISCUSSION
    • ABOUT THE AUTHORS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Purpose Advertising And the Credibility Gap
  • Advertising Eco-Friendly Behavior To Young Adults: “Sweat” or “Do Good”?
  • Special Issue Preview
Show more Articles

© 2023 the Journal of Advertising Research

The ARF is the premier advertising industry association for creating, aggregating, synthesising and sharing the knowledge required by decision makers to lead and succeed.

www.thearf.org

JAR is published four times a year for the Advertising Research Foundation by WARC. Both subscribers and ARF members can access recent issues of JAR via this site.

A larger JAR archive is accessible at WARC, alongside case studies, best practice guides, marketing intelligence, consumer insight, industry trends and latest news from around the world.

Take a trial of WARC.com

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Digital First
  • JAR Best Paper
  • Topics
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Calls for Papers
  • About JAR
  • Subscribe to JAR
  • Pay per view
  • ARF members
  • Meet the Editors
  • ARF and Editorial Review
  • JAR in the News
  • My Folders

Contact us

  • Contact
  • Feedback
  • ARF members

General

  • About the ARF
  • About WARC
  • Rights & Permissions
  • Advertise in JAR
  • Terms of Use