Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A dyadic study of interpersonal information search

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although interpersonal word-of-mouth communication, by definition, takes place between two people, rarely has the phenomenon of word of mouth been studied using both members of the dyad. Building on the literature, this article offers a model of active interpersonal information search that is tested by using a method in which information seeker and source perceptions were obtained. Source characteristics were important determinants of interpersonal influence, but seeker characteristics also played an important role. Interestingly, it proved useful to distinguish between demographic and attitudinal homophily of seeker and source as the former was inversely and the latter directly related to interpersonal influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apasu, Yao, Shiguera Ichikawa, and John L. Graham., 1987. “Corporate Culture and Sales Force Management in Japan and America.”Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 7 (November): 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Johan. 1967a. “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product.”Journal of Marketing Research 4 (August): 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967b. “Word of Mouth Advertising and Informal Communication.” InRisk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Ed. D. F. Cox. Boston: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, 188–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. “Word-of-Mouth Advertising and Perceived Risk.” InPerspectives in Consumer Behavior. Ed. H. Kassarjian and T. Robertson. Glenwood, IL: Scott, Foresman, 330–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, Steven. 1975. “The Innovative Communicator in the Diffusion Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 12 (February): 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, Barry. 1985. “Word of Mouth: The Indirect Effects of Marketing Efforts.”Journal of Advertising Research 25 (June/July): 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Vincent Carroll, and Ambar Rao. 1985. “Harnessing the Power of Word of Mouth.” InInnovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance. Eds. V. Mahajan and Y. Wind. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, William O., Richard G. Netemeyer, and Jesse E. Teel. 1989. “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (March): 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Sharon and Scott Smith. 1987. “External Search Effort: An Investigation Across Several Product Categories.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (June): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Peter and Marsha Richins. 1983. “A Theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions.”Journal of Marketing 47 (Summer): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Daniel Sherrell, and Nancy Ridgway. 1986. “Consumer Search: An Extended Framework.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (June): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bone, Paula Fitzgerald. 1992. “Determinants of Word-of-Mouth Communications During Product Consumption.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Eds. John Sherry and Brian Sternthal. Vol. 19. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 579–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, John and Albert Hunter. 1989.Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jacqueline and Peter Reingen. 1987. “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (December): 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, Merrie. 1985. “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Nigel C. G., John L. Graham, Alain Jolibert and Hans Gunther Meissner. 1988. “Marketing Negotiations in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H. and G. W. Allport. 1935.The Psychology of Radio. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celsi, Richard L. and Jerry C. Olson. 1988. “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, Terry L. 1986. “Assessment of Psychometric Properties of an Opinion Leadership Scale.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (May): 184–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James, Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel. 1966.Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Scott. 1964. “Perceived Risk as a Factor in Product-Oriented Word-of-Mouth Behavior: A First Step.” InReflections on Progress in Marketing. Ed. L. G. Smith. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. “Perceived Risk as a Factor in Informal Consumer Communications.” InRisk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Ed. D. F. Cox, Boston: Harvard University Press, 265–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doob, L. W. 1948.Public Opinion and Propaganda. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, Grahame R. and Richard Staelin. 1994. “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (June): 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J., R. Kegerreis, and R. Blackwell. 1969. “Word-of-Mouth Communication by the Innovator.”Journal of Marketing 33 (July): 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Franklin B. 1963. “Selling as a Dyadic Relationship—A New Approach.”American Behavioral Scientist 6 (May): 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feick, Lawrence and Linda L. Price. 1987. “The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information.”Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Sidney and Merlin Spencer. 1965. “The Effect of Personal Influence in the Selection of Consumer Services.” InMarketing and Economic Development. Ed. Peter Bennett. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Robert J. and Linda L. Price. 1992. “An Investigation Into the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December): 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes and Fred L. Bookstein. 1982. “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (November): 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and William T. Robinson. 1983. “Industrial Organization and Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction.”Journal of Consumer Research 9 (March): 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, Marian and Peter Wright. 1994. “The Persuasion-Knowledge Model: How People Cope With Persuation Attempts.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (June): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furse, David, Girish Punj, and David Stewart. 1984. “A Typology of Individual Search Strategies Among Purchasers of New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (March): 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes, and John Kim. 1991. “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (March): 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, Dawn and Nigel Hopkins. 1992. “Modeling Dyadic Interactions and Networks in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob and Wayne Hoyer. 1981. “What if Opinion Leaders Didn’t Know More? A Question of Nomological Validity.”Advances in Consumer Research 8: 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl B. and Dag Sörbom. 1981.LISREL V: Analysis of Linear Structure Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Methods. Chicago: National Education Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, George and Eva Mueller. 1954. “A Study of Purchasing Decisions.” InConsumer Behavior: The Dynamics of Consumer Reaction. Ed. L. H. Clark. New York: New York University Press, 30–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. and P.F. Lazarsfeld. 1955.Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, Susan M. 1995. “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, Geoffrey and Roger Layton. 1981. “Dimensions of Consumer Information Seeking Behavior.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May): 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Charles. 1964. “Fashion Adoption: A Rebuttal to the ‘Trickle Down’ Theory.” InToward Scientific Marketing. Ed. Stephen Greyser. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 108–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and John Summers. 1970. “Overlap of Opinion Leadership Across Consumer Product Categories.”Journal of Marketing Research 7 (February): 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knower, F. H. 1935. “Experimental Studies of Changes in Attitude. I. A Study of the Effect of Oral Argument on Changes of Attitude.”Journal of Social Psychology 6: 315–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1936. “Experimental Studies of Changes in Attitude. II. A Study of the Effect of Printed Argument in Changes of Attitude.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 30: 522–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul and Robert Merton. 1954. “Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis.” InFreedom and Control in Modern Society. Eds. Monroe Berger, Theodore Abel, and Charles H. Page. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, Bruce and Jon Udell. 1964. “Consumer Behavior in the Market Place.”Journal of Retailing 40 (Fall): 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R. and P. Reilly. 1973. “An Exploration of the Effects of Perceived Social and Performance Risk on Consumer Information Acquisition.” InProceedings, Fourth Annual Conference, The Association for Consumer Research, 393–405.

  • McGrath, Joseph E. 1982. “Dilematics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas.” InJudgement Calls in Research. Eds. Joseph E. McGrath, Joanne Martin, and Richard A. Kulka. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Andrew A. and Peter A. Dacin. 1996. “The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise.”Journal of Consumer Research 23 (December): 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Keith B. 1991. “A Test of Services Marketing Theory: Consumer Information Acquisition Activities.”Journal of Marketing 55 (January): 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. and B. Hamm. 1969. “Canonical Analysis of Relations Between Socioeconomic Risk and Personal Influences in Purchase Decisions.”Journal of Marketing Research 6 (August): 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lynn W. 1981. “Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (November): 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Linda and Lawrence Feick. 1984. “The Role of Interpersonal Sources in External Search: An Informational Perspective.”Advances in Consumer Research 10: 250–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, Girish and Richard Staelin. 1983. “A Model of Consumer Information Search Behavior for New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 9 (March): 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, Marsha and Terri Root-Shaffer. 1988. “The Role of Involvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-of-Mouth: An Implicit Model Made Explicit.”Advances in Consumer Research 15: 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas. 1971.Innovative Behavior and Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, J. Zielinski, and S. Ward. 1984.Consumer Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1995.Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and D. Bhowmik. 1971. “Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research.”Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselius, T. 1971. “Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods.”Journal of Marketing 35 (January): 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, Joel and Frank J. Kohout. 1983. “Individual and Group Information Acquisition in Brand Choice Situations.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (December): 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish. 1971. “Word-of-Mouth in Low-Risk Innovations.”Journal of Advertising Research 11: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, Narasimhan and Brian T. Ratchford. 1991. “An Empirical Test of a Model of External Search for Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 18, 2 (September): 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, Hans B. 1971. “Concentration of Information Power Among Consumers.”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (November): 427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Eugene J., Donald T. Campbell, Richard D. Schwartz, and Lee Sechrest. 1981.Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, W. H. 1934. “An Experimental Comparison of the Speech, the Radio and the Printed Page as Propaganda Devices.”Archives of Psychology, no. 169.

  • Wolfinbarger, Mary Finley and Mary C. Gilly. 1993. “The Encoding and Decoding of Gift Symbolism.” Working paper. University of California at Irvine.

  • Yale, Laura J. and Mary C. Gilly. 1995. “Dyadic Perceptions in Personal Source Information Search.”Journal of Business Research 32 (March): 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Irvine

    Mary C. Gilly & John L. Graham

  2. California State University, Long Beach

    Mary Finley Wolfinbarger

  3. Fort Lewis College, Durango, USA

    Laura J. Yale

Authors
  1. Mary C. Gilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John L. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary Finley Wolfinbarger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura J. Yale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Mary C. Gilly is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Management and associate dean of Graduate Studies at the University of California, Irvine. Her Ph.D. is in marketing from the University of Houston. Her research interests include the unintended effects of marketing actions, such as the effects of advertising on employees. She also has interests in services marketing, such as customer service, including consumer complaint handling, and cross-cultural service encounters. Her work has been published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Business Research, and other academic journals.

John L. Graham is a professor in the Graduate School of Management at the University of California, Irvine. His Ph.D. is in marketing from the University of California, Berkeley. His primary research interests regard international marketing, international business negotiations, and structural equations modeling. His work has been published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Research, Marketing Science, theJournal of International Business Studies, Management Science, and other academic journals.

Mary Finley Wolfinbarger is an associate professor at California State University, Long Beach and is doing research on the topics of internal marketing and gift giving. She teaches Marketing Principles and Marketing Research. She received her Ph.D. in marketing from the University of California, Irvine. Her work has appeared in theJournal of Marketing and other academic journals.

Laura J. Yale came to Fort Lewis College in 1991. She holds degrees in Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Administration from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and received her Ph.D. from the University of California, Irvine. She teaches a variety of courses in Marketing and Travel and Tourism Administration, including Marketing Research, International Marketing and Services. Her industry experience and most of her research interest are in the services sector, particularly the tourism industry. She is on sabbatical leave this academic year, writing an introductory textbook on the tourism industry. She will return to teaching in September 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilly, M.C., Graham, J.L., Wolfinbarger, M.F. et al. A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 26, 83–100 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398262001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398262001

Keywords

Search

Navigation