Skip to main content
Log in

An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the relationships between selected marketing mix elements and the creation of brand equity. The authors propose a conceptual framework in which marketing elements are related to the dimensions of brand equity, that is, perceived quality, brand loyalty, and brand associations combined with brand awareness. These dimensions are then related to brand equity. The empirical tests using a structural equation model support the research hypotheses. The results show that frequent price promotions, such as price deals, are related to low brand equity, whereas high advertising spending, high price, good store image, and high distribution intensity are related to high brand equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. 1991.Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets.”California Management Review 38 (Spring):102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “Should You Take Your Brand to Where the Action Is?”Harvard Business Review 75(September/October):135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert Jacobson. 1994. “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 31(May):191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, Joseph W. and J. Wesley Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.”Journal of Consumer Research 13(March):411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103(3):411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, Robert B., Clyde A. Haulman, and Carlisle E. Moody, Jr. 1983. “Quality, Price, Advertising, and Published Quality Ratings.”Journal of Consumer Research 9(March):347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, Elliot, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, J. Merrill Carlsmith, and Marti Hope Gonzales. 1990.Methods of Research in Social Psychology. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldinger, Allan L. 1992. “What CEOs Are Saying About Brand Equity: A Call to Action For Researchers.”Journal of Advertising Research 32(July/August):RC6-RC12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Patrick. 1993. “Brand Equity: Snark or Boojum?”International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(March):93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Sharon E. and Lynn R. Kahle. 1988. “Alternative Hierarchies of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: The Impact of Brand Commitment and Habit.”Journal of Academic Marketing Science 16(Summer):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, Sundar G., P. Rajan Varadarajan, and John Fahy. 1993. “Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions.”Journal of Marketing 57 (October):83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, Robert C. and Kenneth J. Winniewski. 1989. “Price-Induced Patterns of Competition.”Marketing Science 8(Fall):291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth. 1989.Structural Equations With Latent Variables New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William and Amna Kirmani. 1993. “A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality?”Journal of Consumer Research 20(June):111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Eunkyu Lee, and Richard Staelin. 1994. “Mastering the Mix: Do Advertising, Promotion, and Salesforce Activities Lead to Differentiation?”Journal of Marketing Research 31(May):159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Bobby J., Lynn W. Philips, and Alice M. Tybout. 1981. “Designing Research for Application.”Journal of Consumer Research 8 (September):197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chay, Richard and Gerald Tellis, discussion leaders., 1991. “Role of Communication and Service in Building and Maintaining Brand Equity.” InManaging Brand Equity. Report No. 91-110. Ed. Eliot Maltz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Walgren, Cathy J., Cynthia Beal, and Naveen Donthu. 1995. “Brand Equity, Brand Preferences, and Purchase Intent.”Journal of Advertising 24(3):25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, Niraj and Philip Parker. 1994. “Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality.”Journal of Marketing 58(April):81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Peter R. and Alan G. Sawyer. 1990. “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers.”Journal of Marketing 54(July):43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal. 1991. “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation.”Journal of Marketing Research 28(August):307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, Joe A., Alice M. Tybout, and Brian Sternthal. 1978. “Impact of Deals and Deal Retraction on Brand Switching.”Journal of Marketing Research 15(February):72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, Peter H., Julia Y. Han, and Yuji Ijiri. 1991. “Recognizing and Measuring Brand Assets.”Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series. Report No. 91-119. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, Paul, James Oliver, and Cornelis de Kluyver. 1989. “The Relationship Between Distribution and Market Share.”Marketing Science 8 (2):107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes and David F. Larker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18(February):39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, Dhruv, T. Krishnan, Julie Baker, and Norm Borin. 1998. “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions.”Journal of Retailing 74 (Fall):331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, Rajiv and V. Srinivasan. 1992. “Evaluating the Multiple Effects of Retail Promotions on Brand-Loyal and Brand-Switching Segments.”Journal of Marketing Research 29(February):76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sunil. 1988. “Impact of Sales Promotions on When, What, and How Much to Buy.”Journal of Marketing Research 25(November):342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, John R. and Birger Wernerfeldt. 1990. “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (March):393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, Kristiaan and David Schmittlein. 1994 “Understanding Price Effects for New Nondurables: How Price Responsiveness Varies Across Depth-of-Repeat Classes and Types of Consumers.”European Journal of Operational Research 76(July):359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Li-tze and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.”Structural Equation Modeling 6:1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Tod. 1984. “The Myth of Declining Brand Loyalty.”Journal of Advertising Research 24(February/March):9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom. 1993.LISREL 8.02. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, Ajay and Ronald C. Goodstein. 1998 “The Impact of Advertising Positioning Strategies on Consumer Price Sensitivity.”Journal of Marketing Research 35(May):210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, Wagner A. and Gary J. Russell. 1993. “Measuring Brand Value With Scanner Data.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(March):9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Kevin Lane. 1993. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity.”Journal of Marketing 57(January):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998.Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Susan Heckler, and Michael J. Houston. 1998. “The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall.”Journal of Marketing 62(January):48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, Amna, and Peter Wright. 1989. “Money Talks: Perceived Advertising Expenditures and Expected Product Quality.”Journal of Consumer Research 16(December):344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Vicki and Robert Jacobson. 1995. “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity.”Journal of Marketing 59(January):63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, Marsha. 1989. “Establish Brand Equity Through Advertising.”Marketing News (January 22):16.

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Vithala R. Rao, and Rajendra K. Srivastava. 1994. “An Approach to Assess the Importance of Brand Equity in Acquisition Decisions.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 11:221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Hamish. 1989. “Serious Betting on Strong Brands.”Journal of Advertising Research 29(October):11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, David. 1995. “System Beaters, Brand Loyals, and Deal Shoppers: New Insights Into the Role of Brand and Price.”Journal of Advertising Research 35(May/June):RC2-RC7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul and John Roberts. 1986. “Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality.”Journal of Political Economy 55(August):10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. and Ira H. Bernstein. 1994.Psychometric Theory 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. 1997.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Jerry C. 1997. “Price as an Informational Cue: Effects on Product Evaluations.” InConsumer and Industrial Buying Behavior. Eds. Arch Woodside, Jagdish N. Sheth, and Peter D. Bennett. New York: Elsevier, 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Chan Su and V. Srinivasan. 1994. “A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility.”Journal of Marketing Research 31(May):271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswamy, Arvind, Raymond Burke, and Terence A. Oliva. 1993. “Brand Equity and the Extendibility of Brand Names.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(March):61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe. 1989. “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrated Review.”Journal of Marketing Research 26(August): 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, Marsha L.. 1995. “Social Comparison Advertising, and Consumer Discontent.”American Behavioral Scientist 38(February): 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R. and Larry Percy. 1987.Advertising and Promotion Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R. J. 1970.Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Don E. 1998. “Branding the Basis for Marketing Integration.”Marketing News 32(24):8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, Terence A. 1997.Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications. 4th ed. Orlando, FL: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, Allan D., Rajendra K. Srivastava, and Robert W. Ruekert. 1994. “Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management: An Introduction to the Special Issue.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (May):149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Barton Weitz. 1988. “A Perspective on Brand Equity Principles and Issues.” InDefining, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Report No. 88-104. Ed. Lance Leuthesser. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Carol J. and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach.”Marketing Science 12 (Winter):28–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. Joseph and A. Coskun Samli. 1985. “A Path Analytic Model of Store Loyalty Involving Self-Concept, Store Image, Geographic Loyalty, and Socioeconomic Status.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 13(Summer):265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Daniel C. 1992. “Brand Extensions and Advertising Efficiency: What Can and Cannot Be Expected.”Journal of Advertising Research 32(November):11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and C. Whan Park. 1992. “The Effect of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency.”Journal of Marketing Research 29(August):296–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Rajendra and Allan D. Shocker. 1991. “Brand Equity: A Perspective on Its Meaning and Measurement.”Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series. Report No. 91-124. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, Thomas K. 1984. “Methodological Techniques for the Study of Person Memory and Social Cognition.” InHandbook of Social Cognition. Vol. 2. Eds. Robert S. Wyer and Thomas K. Srull. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swait, Joffre, Tulin Erdem, Jordan Louviere, and Chris Dubelaar. 1993. “The Equalization Price: A Measure of Consumer-Perceived Brand Equity.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(March): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard. 1985. “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.”Marketing Science 4(Summer):199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, Russell S. 1986. “A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Products.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (September):250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valarie A. 1988. “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 52(July):2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Boonghee Yoo (Ph.D., Georgia State University) is an assistant professor of marketing at St. Cloud State University. His research interests include brand equity, cross-cultural scale development, service quality, retail productivity, Internet marketing, and marketing methodology. He has published previously in theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, theJournal of Service Research, and theJournal of Marketing Channels.

Naveen Donthu (Ph. D., University of Texas, Austin) is a professor of marketing at Georgia State University. His research interests center on research methodology, site selection models, comparative and outdoor advertising, brand equity, Hispanic consumer research, cross-cultural issues, and customer satisfaction. His work has appeared in journals such asMarketing Science, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Advertising, theJournal of Advertising Research, theJournal of Retailing, and theJournal of Business Research.

Sungho Lee (Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) is an assistant professor of marketing at the University of Seoul, South Korea. His research focuses on understanding consumers’ cognitive processing of brand and price information, brand extension and brand equity, and advertising-driven persuasion processes. He has published previously inAdvances in Consumer Research, Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, Academy of Marketing Science-World Marketing Congress, Korean Marketing Review, andKorean Management Review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, B., Donthu, N. & Lee, S. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 195–211 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282002

Keywords

Navigation