Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task

https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05116-3Get rights and content

Abstract

A biocybernetic system has been developed as a method to evaluate automated flight deck concepts for compatibility with human capabilities. A biocybernetic loop is formed by adjusting the mode of operation of a task set (e.g., manual/automated mix) based on electroencephalographic (EEG) signals reflecting an operator's engagement in the task set. A critical issue for the loop operation is the selection of features of the EEG to provide an index of engagement upon which to base decisions to adjust task mode. Subjects were run in the closed-loop feedback configuration under four candidate and three experimental control definitions of an engagement index. The temporal patterning of system mode switching was observed for both positive and negative feedback of the index. The indices were judged on the basis of their relative strength in exhibiting expected feedback control system phenomena (stable operation under negative feedback and unstable operation under positive feedback). Of the candidate indices evaluated in this study, an index constructed according to the formula, beta power/(alpha power + theta power), reflected task engagement best.

References (9)

  • H Schwilden et al.

    Closed-Loop Feedback Control of Propofol Anaesthesia by Quantitative EEG Analysis in Humans

    British Journal of Anesthesiology

    (1989)
  • J.R Comstock et al.

    The Multi-Attribute Task Battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum No. 104174

    (1992)
  • R.J Davidson

    EEG Measures of Cerebral Asymmetry: Conceptual and Methodological Issues

    International Journal of Neuroscience

    (1988)
  • P Eberlin et al.

    Bilateral differences in parietal-occipital EEG induced by contingent visual feedback

    Psychophysiology

    (1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (459)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text