Skip to main content
Log in

The ad creativity cube: conceptualization and initial validation

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advertising creativity is conceptualized as a function of three dimensions—novelty, meaningfulness, and connectedness. Novelty and meaningfulness involve infocentric aspects, while connectedness incorporates the perspective of the audience. The relationship among these dimensions and ad effectiveness, and the linkage of ad creativity level to persuasion is then posited. Two experiments were conducted among 201 undergraduates. The first tested novelty and meaningfulness; while the second tested connectedness and meaningfulness. The results affirm the proposed conceptual framework. Relative to non-novel and meaningful ads, novel and meaningful ads generated higher ad recall, more favorable ad attitudes, and more upbeat feelings. Novel and non-meaningful ads elicited higher recall, more favorable attitudes toward non-claim elements (Aad-nc), and negative feelings, and less favorable ad attutides toward claim elements (Aad-c) than non-novel and non-meaningful ads. Relative to ads that did not connect with the audience, connected ads elicited higher ad recall, more favorable Aad-c under meaningful ads, lower Aad-c under non-meaningful ads, and higher levels of Aad-nc and warm feelings under both meaningful and non-meaningful ads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Stayman, D. M. (1989). What mediates the emotional response to advertising: The case of warmth. In P. Cafferata & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Cognitive and affective responses to advertising (pp. 287–304). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adlib (1999). “Bill Bernbach Said ...” October, p. 23.

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 174–187 (May).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S. H., & Low, S. Y. M. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 835–854 (October).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassar, L. (1991). Creative paths to great advertising. Viewpoint, 23–24, September/October.

  • Batra, R., Myers, J. G., & Aaker, D. A. (1996). Advertising management (5th edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2004). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communication perspective (6th edn.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Meredeth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 210–224 (September).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 421–433 (December).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Stein, B. (2003). Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 566–578 (March).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geissler, G., Zinkhan, G., & Watson, R. (2001). Key design elements influencing consumer perceptions of web home page complexity. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2(2), 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Creative sparks. Science, 285(5433), 1495–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberland, G., & Dacin, P. (1992). The development of a measure to assess viewers’ judgments of the creativity of an advertisement. In J. F. Sherry, Jr. & B. Sternthal (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (vol. 19, pp. 817–825). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 475–492 (March).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C., & Wallendorf, M. (1980). Some implications of variety seeking for advertising and advertisers. Journal of Advertising, 9(2), 17–18, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, E., & MacInnis, D. J. (1995). Characteristics of portrayed emotions in commercials: When does what is shown in ads affect viewers? Journal of Advertising Research, 35(6), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley, D. (2005). Advertising of, by, and for the people. BusinessWeek, 74–75, July 25/August 1.

  • Lane, W. R., King, K., & Russell, J. T. (2004). Kleppner’s advertising procedure (16th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 156–169 (September).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (2000). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3/4), 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Carnegie symposium (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., Lord, K. R., Dickson, P. R., & Unnava, R. H. (1991). Picture-based persuasion processes and the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 92–107 (June).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., & Rose, R. L. (1990). On the formation and relationship of ad and brand attitudes: An experimental and causal analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 290–303 (December).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy, R. (1983). Ogilvy on advertising. Canada: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. A., Norman, A. T., & Heckler, S. E. (2004). The consumption of television programming: Development and validation of the connectedness scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 150–161 (June).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1994). A revised communication model for advertising: Multiple dimensions of the source, the message, and the recipient. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till, B. D., & Baack, D. W. (2005). Recall and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. D., Burnett, J., & Moriarty, S. (2003). Advertising: Principles and practice (6th edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. L. (1980). Message-evoked thoughts: Persuasion research using thought verbalizations. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 151–175 (September).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, G. M. (1993). Creativity in advertising: Creativity in the journal of advertising. Journal of Advertising, 22(2), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, G. M., & Burton, S. (1989). An examination of three multidimensional profiles for assessing consumer reactions to advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 18(4), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, G. M., & Fornell, C. (1985). A test of two consumer response scales in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 447–452 (November).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, G. M., & Martin, C. R. (1983). Two copy testing techniques: The cloze procedure and the cognitive complexity test. Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the JAMS editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, and the National University of Singapore for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swee Hoon Ang.

Additional information

The authors Swee Hoon Ang, Yih Hwai Lee and Siew Meng Leong are listed alphabetically as each contributed equally to this paper.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Examples of ad stimuli (for H1 and H2)

Appendix 2

Examples of ad stimuli (for H3)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ang, S.H., Lee, Y.H. & Leong, S.M. The ad creativity cube: conceptualization and initial validation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 35, 220–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0042-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0042-4

Keywords

Navigation